Issue 33 – September 2013

You can download the 33rd issue of the EAN Newsletter (in .pdf format) : ALARA Newsletter 33 Content : 1. How to improve RP for patients and workers during interventional procedures, C. Rousse et al. (ASN) 2. Radiation outside workers in Greece S. Economides (GAEC) 3. Incident from installation of new xray tube in brewery gauge, […]

Read more

Issue 32 – February 2013

alara-newsletter-32-february2013

Download the 32nd issue in PDF format: ALARA Newsletter 32 Content: Existing Exposure Situations Intervention in Practice Experiences from a high radon area in Norway Health economics evaluations of radon intervention strategies in Ireland Stakeholders input Dublin WS Summary and recommandations Building ALARA culture as a tool for effective risk communication  

Read more

Issue 31 – September 2012

Download the 31st issue in pdf format  ALARA Newsletter 31 Contents Developing a national radon control strategy for Ireland – David Fenton The IAEA/ILO International Action Plan on Occupational Exposure – Christian Lefaure, Jizeng Ma, Shengli Niu   Development and dissemination of ALARA culture – Sotirios Economides, Franck Hardeman, Fernand Vermeersch, Cristina Nuccetelli, Serena Risica, Caroline Schieber, Annemarie Schmitt-Hannig

Read more

Issue 30 – February 2012

  Download the 30th issue in pdf format  Newsletter 30 Contents A survey of the use of dose constraints across Europe – Stephen Fennell (document not available) Experience feedback from the report of an interventional radiology event at the Strasbourg Academic Hospitals (France) – Carole Rousse  Mining-related radiation exposure of members of the public and of workers: New Calculation Guide […]

Read more

Issue 29 – October 2011

Download the 29th issue in pdf format  Newsletter 29 Editorial F. Vermeersch, EAN Chairperson, P. Croüail, EAN Vice-Chairperson and P. Shaw, EAN Secretary This issue of the Newsletter is almost wholly devoted to the implementation of optimisation in the medical sector, which faces a number of new challenges: the rapid development of modern technologies and procedures involving ionising radiation; […]

Read more

Issue 28 – March 2011

pdf

pdf.pngDownload the 28th issue in PDF format

Editorial

By F. Vermeersch (EAN Chairperson – SCK-CEN Mol, Belgium), P. Croüail (EAN Vice-Chairperson – CEPN, France) and P. Shaw (EAN Secretary – HPA, UK)

Warning – This editorial was written before the recent dramatic events in Japan. The editorial board, and EAN Members would like to send their deepest condolences to the people of Japan, particularly those who have lost loved ones as a result of the earthquake and tsunami. Of course, we also have thoughts for the nuclear workers and firefighters who are trying to prevent an even bigger catastrophe, and for evacuees and other inhabitants of the regions affected by the radiological consequences of the serious accidents that occurred at the Fukushima NPP.

For many years, ALARA has often been considered simply as a tool that aims to balance the cost of (nuclear) workers’ protection against their radiological risks. This is a common simplification of the concept of optimisation, which has considerably evolved since the establishment of the concept of “reasonable practicability” or “reasonable achievability” – the so-called ALARP-ALARA principle – 70 years ago. This concept was first introduced into UK case law (Edwards v. National Coal Board in 1949) after a rockfall in a coal mine killed a worker. The original wording – which explains how ALARP/ALARA came to be interpreted – was: “risks must be averted unless there is a gross disproportion between the costs and benefits of doing so”. Consequently, until the end of the 80’s there was a focus on cost-benefit analysis as a means of radiological risk management. However, it is now recognized that ALARA is far more than this.

The optimisation principle applies to all exposure situations, in all domains of human activity where there is a potential radiological risk for people (workers and/or public). In the nuclear industry, the application of ALARA over 20 years, at an organisational and practical level, has been accompanied by a significant reduction in collective doses – often by a factor of between 2 and 10, for performing the same job or operation. In non-nuclear industries (e.g. industrial radiography, and NORM industries), important steps have been made, although ALARA awareness can still be improved [see G. Frasch, S. Neumaier et al., L. Garbarino – M. Calimero]. In the medical sector, the ALARA culture is not universally embraced in European countries, although there are encouraging signs that the message is starting to be heard [S. Christofides et al. and the EAN 13th Workshop announcement].

Read more

Issue 27 – October 2010

pdf

pdf.pngDownload the 27th issue in PDF format

Editorial – European ALARA Network: a practical pillar in the global organisation of radiation protection

By F. Vermeersch (EAN Chairperson – SCK-CEN Mol, Belgium), P. Croüail (EAN Vice-Chairperson – CEPN, France) and P. Shaw (EAN Secretary – HPA, UK)

In the UNSCEAR presentation at the IRPA conference in Helsinki, the European ALARA Network was mentioned as part of one of the pillars of the global organisation of radiation protection. Our organisation was mentioned together with ISOE, EURADOS and IRPA as a contributor to the dissemination of the practical implementation of the ALARA principle.

This means that the activities of our organisation are recognised at the international level, and that our approach of gathering experience in the field and redistributing this through our network workshops and newsletters is seen as an effective way to disseminate the practical application of ALARA. EAN is considered a valuable tool for the rapid exchange of information and reporting as well as for benchmarking, and  organisations such as IRPA and WHO expressed great interest in our activities.

However EAN needs to be alert and keep its focus on ALARA and the associated new challenges. In order to respond to future radiation protection needs we need to consider issues such as the increase in medical exposures, concerns about natural exposures, the ageing of existing installations and the development of new ones. For each of these we need to find the most effective way of disseminating information and stimulating the practical implementation of ALARA.

Read more